四机BVR雷达扫描-->目标分配-->4V2, 4V4基本战术（挖坑勿入）

LJQC

1. Fire Control Radar Contracts.

    1.1 Long-Range Search (LRS). Assuming previously sanitized airspace, initial search, detection, and targeting employs LRS techniques using RWS with 80-/40-NM range scale, ±60 degrees, and 4-bar elevation. The importance of adhering to search discipline and covering the entire altitude block at expected contact range cannot be overemphasized. One example of setting LRS responsibilities is to have Number One and while Number Two and Number Three search 15,000 feet MSL and up. Assuming a cursor correlation range (CCR) of 30 NM, the low search covers surface to 36,000 feet MSL, while the high search covers 15,000 feet MSL to 51,000 feet MSL.

    1.2 Medium-Range Search (MRS). Recommit or short-range commit situations employ a 15-NM CCR with ±60 degrees search and 4-bar. Scope range is 20 NM, with a transition to LRS after two complete 4-bar scans (two frames per 15 seconds) if no threats are detected. From the previous example, search responsibilities remain the same. For known threats within 20 NM, ensure bogey altitude is bracketed.

    1.3 Short-Range Search (SRS). SRS is usually employed in four instances: when coming out of a Notch against a known threat, when exiting a merge lAW the tactical flow plan, during an uncorrelated spike reaction, and during ridge crossings. ACM or a 10-NM scope can be used. ACM will provide a heads-out lock without a sort. Take care to avoid buddy spikes. A 10-NM scope requires heads-down time but allows selective targeting/sorting and avoids buddy spikes. Remain in a 10-NM scope at least one complete frame (8 seconds) after setting your altitude responsibility before transitioning to MRS.

    1.4 Radar Interpretation. To target properly, accurately identify and label pictures using standardized comm format. For example, a range formation flying nearly perpendicular to the aircraft's course may appear on the radar as a azimuth. Figure 4.101, Standard Radar Pictures, give examples of common adversary formations and comm.





    1.5 Sort Technique. Once a group is detected, determine its numbers and formation. Threat formations may be difficult to break out on the radar at desired sort ranges. Spotlighting the group can enhance a group breakout and determine proper sort. Additional techniques to determine formation and sort/lock the appropriate target are ACQ symbol positioning, RWS/TWS expand, and visually sorting the group at the merge.

    1.6 Lock-On ACQ Symbol Positioning. Command a brief (1- to 2-second) spotlight while placing the center of the ACQ symbol over the contact you wish to lock but biased away from any undesired contact. The radar will attempt to lock the closest return to the center of the cursor position. (See Figure 4.102, SAM/STT Lock-On Technique.)

LJQC

2. Air-to-Air Tactical Execution Ranges.

    2.1 Targeting Range. Targeting range (TR) is the range from the nearest group where the fighters assign or accept responsibility for groups. Targeting Range is a pacing tool for flight leads to weigh the reduction of sanitization versus high fidelity radar information. TR should be far enough to allow for execution of the tactic and allow targeting to occur outside of shot doctrine ranges.

    2.2 Targeting Depth. Targeting depth (TD) is the maximum distance from the leading edge of a targeted group that a flight member can expect to target. Beyond this range, GCI/AWACS owns targeting responsibility.

    2.3 Shot Depth. Shot depth (SD) is the maximum range behind the closest group within which trailing groups will be shot IAW the briefed Shot Doctrine. SD will vary
based on the tactic being executed (Skate, Short Skate, Banzai) as well as the expected range which shots may be taken (threat RCS, ownship altitude and airspeed).

    2.4 Factor Range. FR is the minimum acceptable distance between the group being merged with and another group. Select FR so groups outside of this range are unlikely to affect the merge with the targeted group. FR should allow engaging and killing the targeted group, egressing tail aspect to the second group, and remaining outside that group's maximum stern WEZ. In determining FR, consider the adversary WEZ and expected adversary SA. If the adversaries are expected to be aware and some turning may be required with the targeted group, the flight lead should increase FR. Conversely, if the adversaries are expected to be unaware or non-proficient, the flight lead can set a smaller, more aggressive FR. Additional FR considerations are inner-group formation, acceptable level of risk (ALR), and F-16 missile load. Example FRs below assumes approximately 360 degrees of turning with the targeted group:
    • Heat only threat—10 NM.
    • Radar threat—10 to 15 NM.



    2.5 Minimum Targeting Range. Minimum targeting range (MTR) is the range that the element lead needs to target or share a group to ensure group elimination or support planned intercept flow. MTR is also where wingmen may auto-target IAW the gameplan any group in their AOR coverage not currently targeted. At MTR, the flight lead must be reasonably confident that all groups less than TD (SD or FR depending on tactic) have been accounted for. MTR is based on the ability of flight leads to target or sort, assess the intercept time line for the planned tactic, make decisions on the flight flow (e.g., shot status, crank direction, SSO intercept geometry, engagement decisions, out/abort/DR/NR), and position the element/flight for a successful and survivable engagement. An experienced flight lead may be able to execute these tasks at shorter ranges, and an inexperienced flight lead may need more time and, therefore, a longer range MTR.

    2.6 Minimum Abort Range. Minimum abort range (MAR) is the minimum range to execute a standard abort. A standard abort is a 5-G constant speed slice to tail aspect. In many configurations, this will require AB. It is based on FLO shot by the adversary aircraft with no crank. Aborting at MAR will defeat the adversary’s first shots and ensure the F-16 initially remains outside the tail aspect WEZ of the threat. See AEM, for MAR values versus specific threats.

LJQC

3. Intercept Flow, Targeting, and Sorting Plans.

    3.1 Targeting and Sorting Definitions.

        • Targeting is the process of assigning fighters responsibility for groups. These responsibilities may include supporting BVR missile shots, completing electronic identification (EID), measuring highly accurate target heading direction, or preparing to engage and VID. A fighter who is targeted to a group is said to “own” the group. If another fighter sorts into the group to assist the owner, that fighter is said to “share” the group. These two fighters are collectively called the owner and the sharer.

        • Sorting is the process of determining the “inner-group picture”, establishing track files on the appropriate contacts, and (if applicable) allocating the owner and sharer radars within the group.

    3.2 BVR Employment Flow. In general, if ROE, ID criteria, and weapons load allow BVR missile employment, F-16 intercept flow makes little effort at concealment. The flight lead will allocate radars as appropriate to ensure mission success. Depending on the tactical situation, this may include targeting only his radar or using the wingman’s radar as well to maximize enemy destruction. The wingmen’s radar may be assigned to take long-range missile shots, or complete EID functions on partially identified groups. Flight leads may stay in search until MTR, watching the entire picture “mature”, assuring there are no untargeted groups, and generally striving to ensure fighter survival. If any new groups are detected, Flight leads target and/or update intercept flow as required. When the leading edge of the picture reaches MTR, and no additional groups have been detected, flight leads will ensure leading edge destruction by either targeting the lead group, sorting other contacts in the lead group or continue searching if all contacts in the leading edge are engaged. The fighters may either launch and leave or continue flowing to the merge based on the tactical situation and the flight leader’s decisions.

    3.3 Intercept Responsibilities. This section is divided into three parts; wingman responsibilities, flight/element lead responsibilities, and group owner responsibilities. Wingman and flight lead responsibilities are always in force. Group owner responsibilities exist in addition to basic flight lead and wingman responsibilities. Remember that group ownership has nothing to do with deconfliction contracts and in no way relieves SFs of their basic responsibility to deconflict.【对ACM职责的注释参见http://bbs.3gofly.com/thread-209343-1-1.html】

        3.3.1 Wingmen’s Responsibilities. The flight lead has a great many critical decisions to make throughout this process. The wingman’s job is relatively simple:

        • Stay visual! Never forget your flight path deconfliction duties. Nothing will hurt the team more than forcing your flight lead to take critical time away from primary duties to perform the “housekeeping” task of reorienting or deconflicting from a blind wingman.

        • Fly the briefed formation, so the flight lead can stay visual on you. Your flight lead is probably not watching you as much as you are watching your flight lead.

        • Search your assigned radar AOR. Listen to the picture and report any factor groups not previously reported by C2 or other flight members.

        • Target the group you are told to target. This is a listening exercise. Know the targeting plan, listen to the picture, and keep your radar cursor oriented over the group you anticipate targeting.

        3.3.2 Flight Lead Responsibilities.

            3.3.2.1 Targeting and Radar Allocation. Second, the flight lead is responsible for targeting the picture and allocating radars. In deciding who will target and/or lock, the flight lead must weigh the importance of sanitizing the airspace for undetected groups, the importance of fighter-radar-quality-track fidelity (high fidelity) information, and weapons employment. Sanitization is most important outside of minimum targeting range (MTR) since all factor groups need to be detected by this range. The general concept is that when a radar is targeted, sanitizing the airspace outside of MTR falls to the untargeted element mate. Flight leads must directively swap searches for their wingmen in cases where the element leads are targeted to ensure the airspace within targeting depth (TD)/factor range (FR)/shot depth (SD) is sanitized.

            3.3.2.2 Intercept Time Line. Third, flight leads are responsible for maintaining an appropriate intercept time line for effective tactics execution. This time line includes radar bracket ranges, element fan and/or bracket ranges, pump ranges, outs, aborts, decision range (DR), notch range (NR), shot doctrine and timing, minimum shot range (MSR), targeting ranges (TR/MTR), and skate/short skate. This intercept time line is briefed for the specific scenario and mission of the day based on factors such as level of risk or possibility of gaining full declarations IAW the ROE and is the primary means of maintaining the appropriate level of survivability and lethality.

            3.3.2.3 Formation Position and Responsibilities. Fourth, the flight lead is responsible for knowing the element mate's formation position during the intercept and flying the aircraft to ease the wingman's workload during task-intensive points of the intercept. Extra attention should be placed on wingman position during the following critical times:

            • During shots (regardless of who is shooting).
            • Stabilizing the formation while attempting to gain declarations.
            • Offsetting the formation for SSO or four-ship radar bracket.
            • Directing wingman to target.
            • Directing wingmen to sort.
            • Directing fan/bracket geometry.
            • At out/abort/notch/decision range.
            • At anytime before picking up the supporting role.

            3.3.2.4 Direct Flight/Element Flow and Reforms. Finally, the flight lead must be able to direct tactically sound element and flight flows, reforms, and resets. An element's flow may change many times throughout the course of the intercept. For instance, Number Three may direct a crank in a specific direction only to have the targeted group maneuver outside of WEZs and/or shot doctrine. The element lead may then recognize the picture is changing, assess whether the element's radars are targeted correctly (and fix the targeting if they are not) and finally update the element flow to help the Number One element. The successful flight lead will always assess picture, targeting, and flow throughout the course of the intercept to influence the overall lethality and survivability of the flight.

        3.3.3 Group Owner Responsibilities.

        •  Radar Mechanics. Once targeted, the owner is responsible for executing the proper radar mechanics. If ROE allows the owner must take BVR shots IAW the shot doctrine and ROE. If the group has an incomplete ID owner is responsible for upgrading the ID. The owner is responsible for maintaining high fidelity information on the owned group and communicating position, inner-group picture, maneuvers, leans, and track direction IAW briefed contracts.

        •  Maintain Situational Awareness on the Intercept Time Line. Once targeted, the owner is responsible for maintaining SA on the intercept time line for the targeted group. The wingman must understand the flight lead's plan for flight and element flow enough to know when to be executing the tactic the flight lead wishes to execute (e.g., lock range, shot doctrine, minimum shot range, etc.).

LJQC

占4楼准备施工～～～～～～～～～

LJQC

好了楼下可以回帖鸟～～～～～施工完毕后应该不会看到一大段英文了，但某些解释仍会使用原文

subtor

韩版v5上的？

overstrain

LJQC 发表于 2013-6-2 21:58
好了楼下可以回帖鸟～～～～～施工完毕后应该不会看到一大段英文了，但某些解释仍会使用原文

LJQC速度把空地战术编队和攻击方式教教我吧，现在正在进行对地方面的训练呢~

LJQC

overstrain 发表于 2013-6-3 22:26
LJQC速度把空地战术编队和攻击方式教教我吧，现在正在进行对地方面的训练呢~

OS你英文水平应该不错啊，可以自己去把AFTTP 3-3 V5的对地部分看掉啊（http://f4bms.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=2506）。。。我现在专注于WVR（War Thunder）和BVR（BMS4），精力有限～～

LJQC

subtor 发表于 2013-6-3 19:22
韩版v5上的？

是滴～～不过先打算把WVR双机配合部分用在War Thunder上

overstrain

LJQC 发表于 2013-6-4 14:21
OS你英文水平应该不错啊，可以自己去把AFTTP 3-3 V5的对地部分看掉啊（http://f4bms.com/forum.php?mod=v ...

OK，已经让huli帮忙了~

feiying

很不错的技术贴,希望BMS也有人人BVR对抗,到时使用数据链对抗不错.