3GO模拟飞行网|3GO Cyber Air Force

 找回密码
 注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

搜索
查看: 1226|回复: 13

国外有关“LOCKON”的显卡评测

[复制链接]
发表于 2005-2-19 01:04:29 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
<P>X-bit labs于2月15日放出了2004年最快的27种显卡的游戏评测,其中模拟类包括IL-2、LOCKON、FS2004等项目的评测,现把LOCKON的评测结果转帖如下,也许能为准备为飞行而升级电脑的朋友提供一下参考。</P>
<P>测试平台及参测显卡:</P>
<P><b>AGP 平台:</b></P>
<UL type=disc>
<LI>AMD Athlon 64 4000+ CPU (2.40GHz, 1MB L2 cache);
<LI>ABIT KV8 Pro mainboard;
<LI>OCZ PC-3200 Platinum EB DDR SDRAM (2x512MB, CL2.5-3-2-8);
<LI>Samsung SpinPoint SP1213C HDD (Serial ATA-150, 8MB buffer);
<LI>Creative SoundBlaster Audigy 2 audio card.</LI></UL>
<P><b>PCI Express 平台:</b></P>
<UL type=disc>
<LI>Intel Pentium 4 560 CPU (Socket 775, 3.60GHz, 1MB L2 cache);
<LI>Intel Desktop Board D925XCV;
<LI>Micron PC2-4300 DDR2 SDRAM (533MHz, 2x512MB);
<LI>Samsung SpinPoint SP1213C HDD (Serial ATA-150, 8MB buffer);
<LI>Creative SoundBlaster Audigy 2 audio card.</LI></UL>
<P><b>NVIDIA SLI 平台:</b></P>
<UL type=disc>
<LI>AMD Athlon 64 4000+ CPU (2.40GHz, 1MB L2 cache);
<LI>ASUS A8N-SLI Deluxe mainboard;
<LI>OCZ PC-3200 Platinum EB DDR SDRAM (2x512MB, CL2.5-3-2-8);
<LI>Samsung SpinPoint SP1213C HDD (Serial ATA-150, 8MB buffer);
<LI>Creative SoundBlaster Audigy 2 audio card.</LI></UL>
<P><b>软件环境: </b></P>
<UL type=disc>
<LI>Microsoft Windows XP Pro SP2, DirectX 9.0c;
<LI>ATI CATALYST 4.12, ATI CATALYST 4.12 beta;
<LI>NVIDIA ForceWare 66.93.</LI></UL>
<P><b>AGP 显卡:</b></P>
<UL type=disc>
<LI>NVIDIA GeForce 6800 Ultra 256MB (400MHz/1100MHz)
For details read our article called <a href="http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/leadtek68u.html" target="_blank" >Leadtek WinFast A400 Ultra TDH Graphics Card Review</A>;
<LI>NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GT 256MB (350/1000MHz);
<LI>NVIDIA GeForce 6800 128MB (325/700MHz);
<LI>NVIDIA GeForce 6600 GT AGP 128MB (500/900MHz);
<LI>NVIDIA GeForce FX 5950 Ultra 256MB (475/950MHz)
For details read our article called <a href="http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/fx5950ultra-9800xt.html" target="_blank" >NVIDIA GeForce FX 5950 Ultra against ATI RADEON 9800 XT: Shader Wars</A>;
<LI>NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 128MB (400/850MHz)
For details read our article called <a href="http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/albatron-fx5900.html" target="_blank" >Albatron GiGi GeForce FX5900 PV Graphics Card Review</A>;
<LI>NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 XT 256MB (400/700MHz)
For details read our article called <a href="http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/gainward-5900xt.html" target="_blank" >Gainward FX Power Pack! Ultra/1300XT Golden Sample Review</A>;
<LI>NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 Ultra 128MB (475/900MHz)
For details read our article called <a href="http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/albatron-fx5700.html" target="_blank" >Albatron Gigi GeForce FX5700 Ultra Graphics Card Review</A>;
<LI>ATI RADEON X800 XT Platinum Edition 256MB (520/1120MHz)
For details read our article called <a href="http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/r420-2.html" target="_blank" >Clash of the Titans: ATI RADEON X800 PRO and ATI RADEON X800 XT Against the NVIDIA GeForce 6800 Ultra</A>;
<LI>ATI RADEON X800 XT 256MB (500/1000 MHz);
<LI>ATI RADEON X800 PRO 256MB (475/900MHz)
For details read our article called <a href="http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/asus-x800pro.html" target="_blank" >ASUS AX800 PRO/TD Graphics Card Review</A>;
<LI>ATI RADEON 9800 XT 256MB (412/730MHz)
For details read our article called <a href="http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/sapphire-9800xt.html" target="_blank" >SAPPHIRE RADEON 9800 XT ULTIMATE Edition Extreme Overclocking: Myths and Reality</A>;
<LI>ATI RADEON 9800 PRO 128MB (380/680MHz)
For details read our article called <a href="http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/club3d-radeon9800pro.html" target="_blank" >Club3D RADEON 9800 PR European Finest Graphics Card?</A>;
<LI>ATI RADEON 9500 PRO 128MB (275/550MHz)
For details read our article called <a href="http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/tyan-tachyon-g9500pro.html" target="_blank" >TYAN Tachyon G9500 Pro Graphics Card Review</A>;</LI></UL>
<P><b>PCI Express 显卡:</b></P>
<UL type=disc>
<LI>NVIDIA GeForce 6800 Ultra SLI (425/1100MHz);
<LI>NVIDIA GeForce 6600 GT SLI (500/1000MHz);
<LI>NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GT 256MB (350/1000MHz);
<LI>NVIDIA GeForce 6600 GT 128MB (500/1000MHz)
For details read our article called <a href="http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/geforce6600g-games.html" target="_blank" >NVIDIA GeForce 6600 GT Assaults Mainstream Gaming Market</A>;
<LI>NVIDIA GeForce 6600 128MB (300/500MHz);
<LI>NVIDIA GeForce PCX 5750 128MB (425/500MHz)
For details read our article called <a href="http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/mainstream-pciexpress.html" target="_blank" >Mainstream PCI Express Graphics Cards Review: PowerColor X600 XT vs. Albatron Trinity PCX 5750</A>;
<LI>ATI RADEON X850 XT Platinum Edition 256MB (540/1180MHz)
For details read our article called <a href="http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/ati-radeon-x850.html" target="_blank" >ATI RADEON X850 Platinum Edition: Good Things Go Better</A>;
<LI>ATI RADEON X800 XT 256MB (500/1000MHz);
<LI>ATI RADEON X800 XL 256MB (400/1000MHz);
<LI>ATI RADEON X700 XT 256MB (475/1000MHz)
For details read our article called <a href="http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/ati-radeon-x700.html" target="_blank" >ATI RADEON X700 XT: Architecture Preview</A>;
<LI>ATI RADEON X700 PRO 256MB (420/864MHz)
For details read our article called <a href="http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/ati-radeon-x700-games.html" target="_blank" >ATI RADEON X700 XT: Gaming Performance Preview</A>;
<LI>ATI RADEON X600 XT 128MB (500/730MHz)
For details read our article called <a href="http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/asus-ax600xt.html" target="_blank" >ASUS Extreme AX600 XT/HTVD Graphics Card Review</A>;
<LI>ATI RADEON X300 SE 128MB (325/400MHz)
For details read our article called <a href="http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/powercolor-x300se.html" target="_blank" >ATI Introduces DirectX 9 and PCI Express to Value Graphics Market: PowerColor X300SE Graphics Card Review</A>.</LI></UL>
<P>测试结果:(请点击图片看大图)</P>
<P>

国外有关“LOCKON”的显卡评测

国外有关“LOCKON”的显卡评测

</P>
<P>

国外有关“LOCKON”的显卡评测

国外有关“LOCKON”的显卡评测

国外有关“LOCKON”的显卡评测

国外有关“LOCKON”的显卡评测

国外有关“LOCKON”的显卡评测

国外有关“LOCKON”的显卡评测

国外有关“LOCKON”的显卡评测

国外有关“LOCKON”的显卡评测

国外有关“LOCKON”的显卡评测

国外有关“LOCKON”的显卡评测

</P>
<P>其它项目评测结果请看:</P>
<P><a href="http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/2004-27gpu2.html" target="_blank" >http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/2004-27gpu2.html</A></P>
发表于 2005-2-19 02:05:33 | 显示全部楼层
发现越是把分辨率调得越高,98P和5900的分别反而不大了,怪事!
 楼主| 发表于 2005-2-19 02:19:07 | 显示全部楼层
这有什么奇怪的,此时CPU成为了性能瓶颈。
发表于 2005-2-19 02:23:13 | 显示全部楼层
6600GT好猛啊,好几个都是接近最快了,看来可以考虑这个东西,呵呵!!
发表于 2005-2-19 09:41:19 | 显示全部楼层
得,看来为得过几年才能玩得起这个游戏……
发表于 2005-2-19 10:24:43 | 显示全部楼层
1024以上分辩率居然没有显卡能流畅啊?
 楼主| 发表于 2005-2-19 10:57:32 | 显示全部楼层

看这个测评时应该注意几点:

<P>测AGP卡的平台是AMD64 4000+,虽然主频只有2.4G,但效能应该高于PCIE平台的P4-3.6G,故不同平台的测试数据无太大的可比性,不要单凭数据产生66GT比X850XT还快的错误看法。</P>
<P>估计在测试中是把LOCKON的所有图形效果开到最高(尤其是那个“可视距离”太耗资源了),所以才产生FPS了普遍偏低的现象,实际运用中只要适量降低图形选项,既可在画面损失不大的情况下明显改善速度。</P>
<P>这类评测结果只能作为一个大概的参考,可能存在随机性误差,不必死钻牛角尖。</P>
发表于 2005-2-19 11:03:26 | 显示全部楼层
<P>ATI X800 XT PE竟然还敌不过6800标准版??</P>
发表于 2005-2-19 11:06:56 | 显示全部楼层
CPU性能瓶颈这个问题确实存在,这也不难解释为什么我开抗锯齿和不开抗锯齿时FPS相差不大(有时还会比不开的时候高)
发表于 2005-2-19 13:19:10 | 显示全部楼层
<P>看来还是选6600GT较好,9800Pro差太多了![em01]</P><P>谢谢Pine!</P>
发表于 2005-2-19 15:43:05 | 显示全部楼层
<P>请教老鸟!有个问题不懂!测评的显卡有个是6600GT PCI的!这个是不是用了SLI技术呀!这个测评的结果是不是两块卡组的SLI系统呀?小弟准备装机,于是请教大家!另外LO不是不支持SLI吗?</P><P>大家给我个建议吧!是用6600GT AGP还是6600GT SLI的?</P>
发表于 2005-2-19 15:47:52 | 显示全部楼层
<P>6600GT和9800PRO都不同一个时代的产品,不能说9800Pro差啊!它能跟上目前这种步伐,很不容易了,应该说它强才对!</P>
发表于 2005-2-19 19:58:40 | 显示全部楼层
<DIV class=quote><B>以下是引用<I>扳机</I>在2005-2-19 15:43:05的发言:</B>

<P>请教老鸟!有个问题不懂!测评的显卡有个是6600GT PCI的!这个是不是用了SLI技术呀!这个测评的结果是不是两块卡组的SLI系统呀?小弟准备装机,于是请教大家!另外LO不是不支持SLI吗?</P>
<P>大家给我个建议吧!是用6600GT AGP还是6600GT SLI的?</P></DIV>
<P>倒~~~~~~虽然我不知道6600GT目前还有没有SLI双显卡技术..但可以肯定一点...PCI—E和SLI没必然的关系~~..PCI—E和AGP的区别只是带宽...
<P>目前...分别用这两种传输模式的同型显卡的性能差别并不大~所以推荐买AGP版的6600GT</P>
发表于 2005-2-19 20:22:43 | 显示全部楼层
<P>这个测试看看就算了。我以前看过的一个测试,X800XT  PE 就和6800U差不多速度。属于同级别GPU,即使是在1027*768下也是如此。这里面还涉及到一个驱动问题。测试用老的4.12,那X850这水平也就如此了。我不能不怀疑Xbit LAB的公正性了,要知道ATI为X800系列出的驱动是5.1&amp;5.2,D3D性能提升了20%,即使9800PRO级别的卡也提升达3%。呵呵,用NV优化过的驱动和ATI较老的驱动来比难免误导消费者。有测试表明,ATI的卡对CPU的处理能力要求更高。要完全发挥X850实力不仅需要驱动配合,还需要比A64  4000+/P4  560更强U来喂饱它(也就是pine所说的瓶颈)。</P>
[此贴子已经被作者于2005-2-19 20:25:02编辑过]

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

QQ|小黑屋|手机版|3GO模拟飞行网|3GO Cyber Air Force ( 沪ICP备08002287号|沪ICP备14050587号 )

GMT+8, 2024-10-7 17:36

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表